rawenwolf@meow.social (@rawenwolf@meow.social)
Ok, so who's this woof you ask?
-- I do tech/code
-- I game
-- I can somewhat draw (not as a job, just for fun)
-- I can somewhat climb boulders
-- I sometimes write
and in case you see a fox in a green checkered coat called Roky ... may or may not be me as well ;)
Or you might find a sheppy named Archie :3
Or you may stumble upon a green fluffy noodle derg, Kai-Tan 🐉
Fur in the middle of Europe
Level 30+
Banner by NoxFoxArts
PFP of my sheppy Archie made by @cantdoxthedrox
Post
-
Online platforms have always held all the cards.
Senza categoria@EUCommission
Point 1: Good. That's how it should be because algorithmic feeds are covert propaganda machines the user CANNOT control. No matter what the social platform says, YOU ARE NOT IN CONTROL of algo-driven feed.Point 2: If you want to uphold that, then make sure CURRENT laws are enforced properly. You don't need more laws and regulation. Especially not the kind that contradicts the very values you claim to uphold.
Point 3: The problem here isn't the absence of the right. You can do it anywhere. The problem is that moderation teams need to be held accountable and responsible for their actions. A moderator with no accountability is a danger to any social space, no matter how "correct" their values may be. So the focus needs to be on breaking the authoritarian power dynamic of such places. Remember, people-driven spaces HAVE NO LEADERS. They have delegates who are being held responsible by all others.